![]() ![]() What kind of proof were you looking for? I copied the TXTSETUP.OEM from the original source files. I think they would keep this locked down unless they had a NDA and licensed it to some company and if so we would never know which companies. But Intel would never release the source code of their SATA controller driver. What would prevent a motherboard manufacturer like AsRock from modifying a TXTSETUP.OEM file which is basically a text file which requires no source code to perform? Unless there is some legal contract with Intel that specifically states they couldn’t but I doubt Intel would go that far. Intel has never allowed and will never allow any mainboard manufacturer to touch Intel’s drivers. ![]() ![]() Nevertheless all drivers, which are (and have to be) offered by the OEMs, are made by the Company, which had built the related on-board Controller (here: Intel). Intel can customize as often as it wants its own drivers, but it would never allow any OEM to touch Intel drivers (not even the content of a simple text file like a txtsetup.oem). Intel USB 3.0/3.1 support for the newest Intel Chipsets running you have again written a lot of things, I couldn’t find any proof for your statement, that a mainboard manufacturer has changed a single character in any driver file, which has been released by Intel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |